Sound, Reproducible Science Implicates Vaccines in the Autism Epidemic
Posted on 19 November 2009 by C. Linderman Sr. - ATO Press
Sound and Reproducible Science Implicates Vaccines in the Autism Epidemic
In 2003, The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes LLC, began researching the neuroscience of business and how applying this tactic could possibly enhance business practices. What they found during their research has possibly shaken the very foundations of vaccine science and toxicology.
This New Jersey based think tank sent out a press release on the seventeenth of November 2009 that states that their studies, which implicate vaccines as the cause of autism, are “Grounded on a solid foundation of the laws of physics and chemistry.” One of the aspects of this research that I find most notable is that this is a non-conflicted think tank that was not even looking into these issues for the purpose of obtaining information regarding the causation of autism. This was, for all intents and purposes, an accident.
By mid 2005, two years into their research, The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes LLC had gained great knowledge and made some very substantial findings. They began by researching brain chemicals (neurohormones) that were seemingly involved in logic and emotions. These are of course two areas that have a direct link to productivity in the workplace. With their findings however, they were forced to take two very different paths in the study. One was of course continuing the business model aspect of their research; the other is the reason for this article.
The aspect of the research that we are going to address is regarding life sciences. Particularly “unraveling the complexities of neurohormone disruptions associated with several neurodevelopmental diseases…” to include autism. What these scientists inadvertently found was referred to in this press release as “truly amazing.” The group began using their model to identify specific causal pathways that certain diseases and illnesses are affected by, that cause disruptions in communication in pairs of bodily substances and cells. Meaning that they have found that if the homeostasis (balance) of certain classes of cells associated with these bodily functions are disrupted, the outcome could be autism or other related diseases. The inability of some cells to absorb the critical substances necessary for the brain to function normally can mean that this inability manifests itself in different ways and in different severity. This is particularly pertinent to the autism community primarily because this can explain the different levels of diagnoses evident within the autism spectrum (i.e. classical autism, regressive autism, PDD-NOS, Aspergers, ADHD etc.).
There seems to be many different lines of thinking within the scientific community as to how cells “uptake” the substances that are needed. The confusion primarily lies within the prevalent belief that most substances bind to cells and when needed, these cells create a “port” with which to gain the intracellular communication necessary. This group found that various mechanisms are utilized by cells to absorb the necessary substances needed, to include: osmosis, diffusion, phagocytosis, pinocytosis, pumps and conventional absorption. The hypothesis is that something environmental is creating a situation whereby these cells are unable to absorb substances or communicate in the way that they need to, thusly manifesting at times as a nuerodevelopmental disorder or disease.
Now what is truly amazing is the conclusion that has been reached as to why and how this is happening. You see; this neutral group with no ties to the pharmaceutical or mainstream medical industries has determined that vaccines and their ingredients are to blame. With the help of notable researchers and doctors that are known within the autism community, this study has resulted in some damning results. With the help of research from; Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Dr. Russell Blaylock, Dr. Martha Herbert and others, this group of non conflicted researchers have stumbled upon the proof to reinforce what the autism community has been talking about for quite some time! Vaccines cause autism!
So what could possibly be affecting our bodies on this cellular level within the vaccines? Toxins and allergens that are creating that which we in the autism community have spoken about for some time now: excitotoxcity! Apparently they have found that the gelatin that is prevalent in many of our vaccines, are causing this huge problem. When looking into Dr. Wakefield’s research regarding the MMR vaccine, “the results were beyond (their) expectations.” It seems that since 1979, just prior to the massive continuous rise in autism diagnoses, hydrolyzed gelatin was added to the MMR vaccine as a stabilizer.
MMR is not the only vaccine containing this gelatin. Here are the vaccines that contain this gelatin and the amount in each:
DTaP 0.0015 mg
Influenza 0.025 mg
Measles 14.5 mg
Mumps 14.5mg
Rubella 14.5 mg
MMR II 14.5 mg
Varicella 12.5 mg
Shingles 15.58 mg
Rabies < 12 mg
So here are the challenges that the medical researchers are facing: “Do certain classes of cells absorb substances? If so the entire science of toxicology will change.” If the balances or homeostasis between certain classes of cells that are associated with these important bodily functions are compromised, does this manifest itself as an ASD? These researchers believe it does and they have looked into one particular doctor’s research at length. This doctor is one of the world’s leading researchers regarding this issue: world renowned neurosurgeon and neuroscientist, Dr. Russell Blaylock. Dr. Blaylock’s work explains how the inability of our cells to absorb crucial substances can create this situation that doesn’t allow the brain or the body to work properly. This imbalance is primarily caused by the toxic substances that our children are being subjected to while visiting their doctors early in life and being injected with these causative agents via so-called “life saving vaccines.” I have recently been contacted by The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes regarding some changes that needed to be made to this article and they told me that they would welcome the chance to communicate with Dr. Blaylock regarding this exciting new research.
William McFall is also quick to point out, (no doubt knowing the response that this research will create from the mainstream medical profession) that “We are not opposed to vaccines. Science has irrefutably proven their value. We are merely asking the medical research community to evaluate our model for homeostasis in order to ensure the ingredients in vaccines are not disrupting the body’s processes.”
Make no mistake; this is a huge breakthrough for those of us in the autism community. We have stated time and time again that our children became autistic after being vaccinated. This is not a coincidence as is consistently stated by the medical community and now we have a think tank that is not conflicted in any way that is publically stating just that. They have communicated with those researchers within the autism and vaccine research community that we trust (i.e. wakefield and Herbert) and are willing to work with them to try to get the answers that are so desperately needed. I sincerely hope this happens.
We, as a community, must ensure that this information gets into the mainstream press. This will be of monumental importance and as I am sure we all know, this will also be very difficult to achieve. We are all well aware of the conflicts of interest that the mainstream press has. A relentless push to have our media outlets, our representatives within our governments and our healthcare professionals, read and understand the implications of this data is crucial.
I certainly hope that all of us within the autism community will do our part.
Thanks so much Curt!! I knew alerting the Lindermans was the right thing to do!! You two make such a phenomenal team! Keep us updated and let us know what more we can do to help please.
THANK YOU so much for writing this article Curt! MSM is failing to report this out there (so typical!). As a mother of 6 yr old twin boys that received 40 vaccines each by the time they reached 48 months old(and without regard that they were born 4 weeks early) while watching one twin gradually regress over time with each bout of vaccines given, but told nothing was wrong or related, I am fuming!
I’ve learned the hard way over these past few years and have come to the conclusion: I can NO longer ever trust government, politicians, our pediatrician, MSM, Pharmas, CDC and the FDA.
Seems it’s ALL for profit only and no longer about our safety and well being. How important discoveries like this are swept under the rug while our children (and their parents) pay the heavy price.
Ken, while I can appreciate your views in questioning ASD diagoses, and I also believe that a less restrictive guideline for dx has something to do with the increase, going from 1-10,000 in the mid 1980s to 1-91 now is relevant to a true increase of massive proportions. add to this, that there is also a massive increase in schizophrenia and bi polar disorders as well, and you see a serious rise that can not even be close to being explained away by better diagnoses or awareness.
If you are only looking at the increase since 1980, then you must be excluding PDD-NOS and Asperger’s, both of which weren’t included in the DSM until 1987 and 1994, respectively. That leaves autistic disorder, which was 4:10:000 in the early 1980s, and is estimated at 20:10,000 today. That’s a five-fold increase. But again, the criteria for AD today is less restrictive than it was in 1980.
Ken, the University Of California at Berkley did a great study on this and the numbers still dont add up to what you’re trying to imply. all one has to do is just look around. I can’t take a taxi ride, get on the trian or go to the grochery store withour meeting someone that has a child or cousin or nephew affected. hidin from the numbers won’t change matters at all. as far as the DSM goes, I could care less what a bunch of psychologists think anyway. autism isnt a psychological disorder, everybody now knows that.
If you don’t care about DSM classifications, then you don’t care what the known prevalence of autism was in the early 80s, or today for that matter. And if that’s the case, then why do you tell us the rate of autism has increased from 1:10,000 to 1:91?
Which UC-Berkeley study are you talking about? Do you mean the UC-Davis MIND study?
Yes, I am refering to the MIND study. and it’s not that I dont care about the DSM classification, but as medicine begins to realize that autism is a physiological/systemic condition (and not a psychological one) this is NOW irrelevant. the sooner doctors realize this, the more children can be treated for this condition. worrying about the symantics why more children are being damaged is just plain wrong and shows me that you seem to be more concerned about logistiocs than the children. to know that autism is more prevalant now, one only needs to take a walk around their town, city…or better yet, make a visit to an elementary school. teachers that got out of college 15 years ago were told that they would probably never see an autistic child, now the classrooms are overwhelmed with autistic children. wake up ken, stop worrying about something that is painfully obvious for so many families around the world, or at least get out of the way so that peolpe that care can help solve this problem.
But the whole notion of an autism epidemic is a departure point for your argument, or, as JB Handley recently called it, a “fork in the road for the autism debate.” And yet you think the rationale for the epidemic is beyond debate? The data your side uses are severely flawed. Comparing 1983 figures to 2009 is to compare apples and oranges. Can you do better? It seems not.
“It seems that since 1979, just prior to the massive continuous rise in autism diagnoses…”
I’m curious about this statement. Can you be more specific about the rise in diagnoses? Are you assuming all PDDs rose at the same rate, or just certain ones? Keep in mind that “autistic disorder” was first added to the DSM in 1980, and that today’s criteria for AD are less restrictive than in the DSM III.
Thanks!
but Ken, what I’m saying is that there is no debate when it comes to the autism epidemic. this argument is moot.I have far more pressing issues than worrying about wether YOU or “your side” feels comfortable with the symantics. “your side” has already proved that you are going to do nothing about it. I could care less at this time wether you feel there is an epidemic or not, because I personally know there is.
If “your side” would get off their asses and start looking at how we can truly help these kids, things would be happening a lot faster. Right now there are two treatments that the DSM and main stream medicine suggests for autism disorders, they are: Abilify and Ritilin. GEE THANKS!!!!! I think I’ll worry about the kids out there and not pharma profits, thank you very much!
And your side offers about 200 unproven, alternative bio-medical treatments. I get it.
Ken, just as in the main stream medical establishment, we have our “snakeoil salemen” and because of the obvious rise in the epidemic, there are many that see this as a money making opportunnity, I don’t dispute that. 200 might be a stretch unless you go to the really idiotic stuff. If you’re talking about chelation, diets, IVIGs etc, they’re only unproven by the mainstreams description. I can personally attest to the fact that these work because I have used some of these “unproven” treatments with my son and they have worked. why do you think that a movie was made that essentially put parents searching for treatments on a pedastal (Lorenzo’s Oil) yet the parents of the autism community are continually vilified? It’s not because we’re endangering our children, it’s politics. When government and MS medicine are the cause of the epidemic, those that are searching for answers are vilified to keep the answers from coming out. I honestly believe that. At least we are searching for treatment options and not covering up symptoms with psychotropic medications!
Excellent piece Curt!! I was hoping after finding the press release yesterday and communicating with the NJ group that someone would write an intelligent piece about it. I find it exciting and LONG overdue for people to talk about autism on a cellular level!! It’s sad that it takes a business model to reconcile the homeostasis components in disease.
Autism does not “just happen” for no reason, McKenzie’s comments case in point, this line of thinking is what has stalled any progress in treating autism for decades. Studying singular genes have not produced any results, now supposedly, it’s a possible combination of 100 genes involved but different ones for different people producing the same result??? What a bunch of tail chasing continuously resulting in monumental ignorance. Ignoring the inflammatory response to the immune system and the brain in autism and utilizing only behavioral treatments to overcome a physical condition is insane. I truly hope this business model and the Center’s discovery will get some mainstream press and scientific attention! Our kids need help and medical therapies designed around their particular cellular dyfunction!
Well said C. I noticed the same questions as you. First, many “well informed” docs have long questioned the safety of Rhogam which contains HG and Vitamin K and HIB are given literally at birth. Second, what is a huge genetic component? Please define the specific amount in “huge” It’s a guess, at best. I’m not autistic, my mother is not autistic, my grand mother was not autistic, I new my great-grandmother and she was not autistic…so how does my daughter evolve to be autistic??? Third, autism is relatively new? Ah…it’s been around for the better part 60 years in its defined form. Does Bruno Bettelheim ring a bell for those that forgot “refrigerator mothers?” And finally please find me more than one child that has not been vaccinated and is autistic…still waiting on that one too! Good call C. as this person is a Kool Aide drinking fool! Have a nice day in sand box! We play for keeps out here!
I totally agree with what Curt says. McKenzie says “Autism is a relatively new disorder where as vaccines have been given before its discovery”??? That is quite possibly one of the dumbest things I have heard anyone say. I think it’s sad that someone so out of touch with reality works with autistic people.
McKenzie, vaccines are not the only cause of autism, there’s no doubt about that. But it is the major cause. As far as children being born with autism, how about the mariad of toxic medicines that can and are given to pregnant mothers, such as rohgam, pitosen and lets not forget the HepB vaccine at birth. With autism being a developmental / behavioral disorder, how in the hell do you diagnose it at birth? C;mon, you cant be a developmental psychologist, your post was far too ignorant. you seem more just like a pharma troll. Have a nice day, we dont play nice here.
I do not agree with this article at all. I am a developmental psychologist and have a specialty in Autism. Children can be diagnosed with and Autism Spectrum Disorder before vaccines are given and there is a huge genetic component to the disorder. Autism is a relatively new disorder where as vaccines have been given before its discovery. And what do you “scientists” have to say about all the children who are diagnosed without receiving vaccinations. I do not believe in talking mothers out of vaccinating their children because of an assumption.
Really? You have a “specialty” in Autism? What exactly that means I have no idea! The mothers and fathers of the children with autism are the true autism specialists! You are partially correct that there is a genetic component, but not a “huge” one! As with any auto-immune disease, there is always a genetic suseptibility…”disease” runs in any family…heart disease, cancer, etc. And autism is a fairly new disease first being “coined” a few years after thimerasol was introduced by Eli Lilly…hmmmm just a coincidence? I think not…and how many children do you have that are non-vaccinated with autism? Probably none! At least not the subset that are vaccine-injured which I believe to be all of these sick children! And vaccine numbers have done nothing but increase right along with the increase in the number of children with autism! And, on one final note I will agree with you that I do not agree with talking mothers out of vaccinating….I personally will beg them not too!!!!
Excellent! Thanks Curt! And, you know I will do my part and encourage everyone I know to do the same. Kudos my friend!!